Bias Audit & Testing
Imposed by 7 regulations across 7 jurisdictionsProviders & Deployers
Regulations
Regulations imposing this obligation
Every AI hiring rule that imposes this duty and who it applies to.
Partially in forceConnecticut
Connecticut: Automated Employment Decision Technology Provisions of the Online Safety Act (Public Act 26-15 / SB 5)
In forceCalifornia
California: Employment Regulations Regarding Automated-Decision Systems (FEHA)
Partially in forceEuropean Union
European Union: Artificial Intelligence Act (Regulation (EU) 2024/1689)
In forceNew York City
New York City: Automated Employment Decision Tools Law (Local Law 144 of 2021)
Not in forceNew Jersey
New Jersey: Automated Employment Decision Tool Bias Audit Bill (A1021)
Not in forceNorth Carolina
North Carolina: Fair AI Hiring Act (HB 1161)
Not in forcePennsylvania
Pennsylvania: Automated Employment Decision Tool Transparency and Audit Bill (HB 594)
7 records
| Connecticut: Automated Employment Decision Technology Provisions of the Online Safety Act (Public Act 26-15 / SB 5) | Partially in force | Connecticut | 1 October 2026 | |
| California: Employment Regulations Regarding Automated-Decision Systems (FEHA) | In force | California | 1 October 2025 | |
| European Union: Artificial Intelligence Act (Regulation (EU) 2024/1689) | Partially in force | European Union | 2 August 2024 | |
| New York City: Automated Employment Decision Tools Law (Local Law 144 of 2021) | In force | New York City | 1 January 2023 | |
| New Jersey: Automated Employment Decision Tool Bias Audit Bill (A1021) | Not in force | New Jersey | ||
| North Carolina: Fair AI Hiring Act (HB 1161) | Not in force | North Carolina | ||
| Pennsylvania: Automated Employment Decision Tool Transparency and Audit Bill (HB 594) | Not in force | Pennsylvania |
Showing 1-7 of 7 records
Page 1 of 1
Stay ahead of AI hiring compliance before it lands.
Free alerts on the regulation, litigation and incidents shaping AI in hiring.